Introduction
Astrology is based on the analysis and detection of correlated patterns. Causation and correlation are two different ways of studying related phenomena. Switching on an oven is the obvious cause for a cake to be baked but the consumption of flour, sugar, eggs, butter and electricity in the kitchen is strongly correlated to the appearance of a cake. These six events are part of a pattern and the presence of the first five will be correlated to or lead to a prediction of the presence of the sixth. Viewed from this perspective of pure correlation, astrology is no different from data science where a pattern of data - in this case the positions of planets at birth – is used to calculate the possibility of certain outcomes.
[ Actual Python codes are available in the Parashar21 repository at Github and the two Colab Notebooks, namely P21_45_10_MultiChart_Analysis and P21_45_09_Single_AshtakVarga_Gochar demonstrate the theoretical constructs discussed in this article ]
Regular data science uses a set of digital data, preferably numbers, to predict a certain outcome. For example, data regarding age, income, gender, ownership of vehicles, cars, bank account and other personal information can lead to the prediction of whether or a person will repay a loan (or purchase a car). This is a straightforward data science or more precisely, a machine learning problem. There is a lot of mathematics that can justify these predictions, even though there is no direct cause:effect relationship between any of these data points and the event that is being predicted. The presence of past data is used to establish significant correlations between these events and forms the basis of successful predictions.
When it comes to astrological data, there is a major difference and a significant difficulty. The data used in machine learning, say the value of age, or income, generally has the same significance across all samples used to identify the correlations. But in the case of astrology, the position of a graha, say Mars in Mesh rashi, has a different significance, depending on say ( but not limited to), (a) the bhav number of the same Mesh rashi for this person, (b) whether the same bhav is aspected by another graha, (c ) whether the same bhav is aspected by the lord of another bhav, (d) whether the graha Mars is conjuncted by another graha or (e) or by another lord and so on. So the location of a graha in one rashi is not just a single point of data, (like the value of age or income in data science) but just one component of a piece of data of a higher dimensionality, that needs to be factored in while establishing correlations. [ We assume that astrologers reading this article will understand the meaning of graha, rashi, bhav, lord etc. while others will read these as additional dimensions of data] In machine learning and data science this problem is usually addressed with dummy variables that are not present in the original data set. Our approach uses a similar strategy by employing dummy variables as explained later.
Traditionally, this complex, multi-dimensional data is represented as a visual artefact, the horoscope chart, that astrologers use to spot patterns. Given the very large number of dimensions involved, this is not easy. Though the process is totally algorithmic, or rule based, it is quite laborious and only an experienced astrologer can determine and identify the higher dimensional data with speed and accuracy. Those who cannot do so, fail to spot all the patterns and end up with erroneous predictions. This is where we are naively tempted to use the processing power of modern computers, but as we know, the accuracy of the output of a computer program depends almost entirely on the quality of data with which it works. A human astrologer works with visual data available in the form of a horoscope chart, but a computer cannot use the image of a chart to look for patterns. To be of any use, the visual chart of a horoscope must be converted into a set of numbers that can be stored and processed on a machine. The data that describes a horoscope can be defined at multiple levels of complexity. This article describes a mechanism for handling and processing this high-dimension data using a combination of Python programs in Jupyter notebooks and the MongoDB database.
Data Structures
At the lowest level, L0, a horoscope is uniquely identified by just five pieces of information: Date and Time of birth, Latitude and longitude of the place of birth and the TimeZone offset of the local time from UTC (or Universal Coordinated Time).
Based on this L0 data, we can use an ephemeris to calculate the next level, L1, astronomical data that consists of the longitude of 10 grahas (5 true planets, sun, moon and three special virtual objects, namely lagna, rahu and ketu) 5 of the 10 grahas can have temporary retrograde motion so in addition to their longitude, we need to record this fact. So, level L1 data consists of fifteen variables, where 10 are numeric values of longitude and 5 are Boolean variables (that can take a value of true, if the graha is retrograde and false, if they are not).
Based on this purely astronomical L1 data, astrologers calculate their own astrological L2, data based on the principles of the kaal-chakra (or zodiac) where longitudes in level L1 data are replaced by corresponding rashi numbers (or names) that show the rashi where each graha resides.
The conversion of level L0 data to level L1 and then level L2 is quite straightforward and there are computer programs and websites that will do this calculation without any difficulty. Computerised Horoscope charts usually present this level L2 data in a variety of styles, namely, the Bengal Style, the North Indian Style (where in both cases, the rashis are arranged counterclockwise) and the South Indian style (where the rashis are arranged clockwise).
Newspaper columns and websites that publish monthly and weekly predictions do so on the basis of just one, single component of L2 data – the rashi position of either the Sun (in 'western' astrology) or the Moon (in 'Indian' astrology) – and hence are grossly inaccurate.
This is where we introduce the dummy variables in the form of level L3 data.
High Dimension Data
From Level L2, a series of increasingly complicated set of level L3, data points need to be calculated for positions, aspects and conjuncts :
Basic:
L3.1 : 12 bhav numbers - Based on the position of the lagna, each rashi gets a bhav number
L3.2 : 12 bhav lords - Each bhav gets a graha identified as its lord based on its rashi
L3.3 : 9 Locations of planets in terms of the bhav where the graha resides
L3.4 : 12 Locations of lords in terms of the bhav where the lord resides
Positions:
L3.5 : 9 Booleans that specify whether a graha is exalted
L3.6 : 9 Booleans that specify whether a graha is debilitated
L3.7 : 9 Booleans that specify whether a graha is at MoolTrikana
L3.8 : 9 Booleans that specify whether a graha is in Friendly rashi
L3.9 : 9 Booleans that specify whether a graha is in Hostile rashi
L3.10 : 9 Booleans that specify whether a graha is in Neutral rashi
L3.11 : 12 Booleans that specify whether a lord is exalted
L3.12 : 12 Booleans that specify whether a lord is debilitated
L3.13 : 12 Booleans that specify whether a lord is at MoolTrikana
L3.14 : 12 Booleans that specify whether a lord is in Friendly rashi
L3.15 : 12 Booleans that specify whether a lord is in Hostile rashi
L3.16 : 12 Booleans that specify whether a lord is in in Neutral rashi
Aspects:
L3.17 : 10 sets of graha Aspects where each set consists of grahas aspecting one graha
L3.18 : 10 sets of graha AspectedBY where each set consists of grahas that are aspected by one graha. Note that A aspecting B does not necessarily imply that B aspects A. There are rules that govern aspects.
L3.19 : 12 sets of bhav Aspects where each set consists of grahas aspecting a bhav
Conjunct:
L3.20 : 10 sets of graha - graha Conjuncts where each set consists of grahas that conjunct each graha
L3.21 : 12 sets of lord - graha Conjuncts where each set consists of grahas that conjunct each lord
L3.22 : 12 sets of lord - lord Conjuncts where each set consists of lords that conjunct each lord
Beginning with only 5 pieces of data in level L0, we move to 15 pieces of data in level L1 and L2 and then 22 additional pieces of data in level L3. This transformation from L0 to L3 is done as per the rules given in Rao & Rao [1]. The critical issue here is that unlike L0, L1, L2 data, L3 data structures are not elemental (that is, consisting of just a single number or Boolean) but often collections or sets of associated data. So, in effect, L3 data has more than the 22 components that are listed here. This means that a horoscope is not merely a pattern drawn on a piece of two-dimensional paper but is an instance of an object of very high dimensionality.
Storing and processing this kind of an object that has data with high dimensionality needs programs that are an order of magnitude more complicated than most Computer Horoscope programs that are generally available.
Python and MongoDB
Parashar21 is a collection of python programs, developed on the Google Colab platform, that convert L0 data into L3 data. But the derived level L3 data needs to be stored in a manner that will allow easy and intuitive access. Storing even level L2 data in a computer system poses significant problems.
Horoscope charts, that are a visual representation of level L2 data, can of course be stored as image files in png or jpg format. However, this conversion to an image format leads to an immediate loss of information, because an image file cannot be identified, and retrieved, on the basis of the position of a graha in a particular rashi. For example, if we want to retrieve horoscopes that have the moon in Meen rashi and sun in Makar rashi, it cannot be done if the chart is stored as a simple image file. This is because the image file only stores spatial information of the proximity of the phrases 'Mo' and 'Su’ to certain squares and triangles merely on the diagram without the semantic information that connects the phrases ‘Mo' and 'Su' to the grahas moon and sun, or the squares to Meen or Makar rashis.
Level L2 data can of course be stored in a traditional flat file or a relational database like Oracle or MySQL without loss of information but when we move to level L3, the storage and retrieval becomes extremely complicated. This is because relational databases can only store elemental data, and not sets of data, in any field. Requirements to retrieve horoscopes that have, for example, moon in the first bhav and lagna aspected by saturn, would be almost impossible to fulfill. But this is precisely the kind of pattern that we are looking for.
This is where we introduce MongoDB, a very popular and widely used document storage platform as the database of choice. MongoDB stores information as documents in the JSON format that allows sets to be defined. MongoDB and the JSON format are very widely used in the modern software industry, and we will now demonstrate their utility in astrology through a representative case study.
Case study
The Astro-Databank Wiki [2] has a database of horoscope related information collected by Lois Rodden that is available in the public domain. This database consists of html pages for every individual that contains level L0 information along, six additional data fields containing data about their vocation (or profession) and a quality tag that indicates the estimated level of accuracy of the date and time of birth. From these html pages we extracted 39,663 pieces of (the most accurate) AA rated horoscope data along with three of the six vocation parameters and converted them into a CSV text file.
The Parashar21 python programs were used to convert this data level L0 data into level L3 information and this was stored in a MongoDB database as 39,662 JSON documents. [ data for 1 individual could not be processed]
On this database, two kinds of retrieval tests were performed:
1. Random horoscopes were selected, based on arbitrary parameters and computed values of the 22 odd level L3 variables and printed for manual comparison against the corresponding visual charts. No errors were detected in the samples that were chosen for review. Since no errors were detected, we assume that the computation is correct, even though, as in the case of all software, absence of evidence (of errors) is no evidence of absence (of errors).
2. The query facilities of MongoDB were used to locate horoscopes that meet certain requirements. Samples from the retrieved horoscopes were printed and it was found that the queries were indeed giving correct results as shown below:
We first give the English version of the query followed by the same query using the MongoDB query language:
—----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retrieve charts that have -
Lagna aspected by Saturn
{"GAspectedBy2.La": {"$in": ["Sa"]}}
9991 Charts selected from 39667. Random 5 charts printed.
—----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retrieve charts that have -
Lagna aspected by Saturn AND
Exalted Jupiter
{"$and": [{"exaltG.Ju": {"$eq": true}}, {"GAspectedBy2.La": {"$in": ["Sa"]}}]}
874 Charts selected from 39667. Random 5 charts printed.
—----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retrieve charts that have -
Lagna aspected by Saturn AND
Exalted Jupiter AND
Sun conjunct with Mercury
{"$and": [{"exaltG.Ju": {"$eq": true}}, {"GAspectedBy2.La": {"$in": ["Sa"]}}, {"GConjunctsG2.Su": {"$in": ["Me"]}}]}
440 Charts selected from 39667. Random 5 charts printed.
—----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retrieve charts that have -
Lagna aspected by Saturn AND
Exalted Jupiter AND
Sun conjunct with Mercury AND
Moon in Bhav 1
{"$and": [{"exaltG.Ju": {"$eq": true}}, {"GAspectedBy2.La": {"$in": ["Sa"]}}, {"GConjunctsG2.Su": {"$in": ["Me"]}}, {"GrahaBhava.Mo": {"$eq": 1}}]}
41 Charts selected from 39667. Random 5 charts printed.
—----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retrieve charts that have -
Lagna aspected by Saturn AND
Exalted Jupiter AND
Sun conjunct with Mercury AND
Moon in bhav 1 AND
4th lord in bhav 5
{"$and": [{"exaltG.Ju": {"$eq": true}}, {"GAspectedBy2.La": {"$in": ["Sa"]}}, {"GConjunctsG2.Su": {"$in": ["Me"]}}, {"GrahaBhava.Mo": {"$eq": 1}}, {"LordBhav.4": {"$eq": 5}}]}
2 Charts selected from 39667. Random 2 charts printed.
—----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The two North India and South style charts generated by the program for two horoscopes retrieved from the MongoDB database from the last query with 5 conditions are shown here. The full reports generated by all 5 queries in three styles (Bengal, North India, South India) are available in the GitHub repository.
Discussion
Number
of Conditions |
Number
of Charts Retrieved |
Number
of Charts Printed |
1 |
9991 |
5 |
2 |
874 |
5 |
3 |
440 |
5 |
4 |
41 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
Data and Tools Used
Scope of Future Work
Supplementary Information
References:
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19476.58240
This is an informative post and it is very useful and knowledgeable. Therefore, I would like to thank you for your efforts in writing this article.
ReplyDelete